Dear Richard, All,

Thank you for spotting the missing redirection!:-)

The question, if we should redirect to the latest draft version, rather the official release, should be discussed in Berlin.

Anybody, who knows better what to do than what this document states, please give us a complete proposal what we should do and better not what's wrong with what we do. It's not a field we at FORTH are particularly interested in;-), and hope someone on this list is more knowledgeable about.

#E5: I think we point into an XML-RDF file.



On 11/21/2018 4:54 PM, Richard Light wrote:


I'm always happy to see a paper on Linked Data, but we should note that this one dates from January 2013.

The RDFS version to which the Linked Data URLs redirect is, however, still the 5.0.4 that the paper mentions.  Shouldn't those redirects be updated to point to the latest published version for which we have an RDFS version (6.2.1)?

Finally, the RDF redirect URLs include a '#' reference at the end (e.g. However, this is meaningless in the context of the RDF document, since it does not contain any XML Ids.

Best wishes,


On 21/11/2018 11:39, Bekiari Xrysoula wrote:
Dear All

new technical paper is uploaded in

all the best

Richard Light

Crm-sig mailing list

 Dr. Martin Doerr
 Honorary Head of the                                                                   
 Center for Cultural Informatics
 Information Systems Laboratory  
 Institute of Computer Science             
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   
 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,         
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece