[Crm-sig] ISSUE 584: AP29 discarded into -scope note refinement pertaining the quantification of AP 29 (32),

Christian-Emil Smith Ore c.e.s.ore at iln.uio.no
Sun May 8 21:27:34 EEST 2022


Dear all,

This issue is about the quantification of the new property (accepted in the 52nd meeting). First of all, we forgot about the three new properties AP 29-31. So the number of  AP29 must be changed to AP32.


Achille, Gerald and I have discussed the quantification and came to the following conclusion


The first part of the quantification of AP29(32) (0, n) is fine since it seems obvious to us that the same instance of A1 Excavation Processing Unit may discard matter into multiple heaps, unless there is a clearly establishing criterion of close correspondence between each A1 and the heap in which the material extracted from it is discarded. We don't think this criterion can always be followed,  so we would keep the quantification as broad as possible to enclose all the possible cases that could occur during an excavation.

We equally believe that the material produced during an A1 Excavation Processing Unit can be discarded into any heap, but also  simply thrown away without any order or exported to be deposited elsewhere, thereby breaking any close correspondence between the excavation and the deposit.

In conclusion, our opinion  that the "(0,n:0,n) many to many" is the right quantification. We also think that quantification, once decided, does not have to be motivated in the scope notes. Such a motivation is not found in the scopenotes for the other six properties with A1 Excavation Processing Unit, see below. If a motivation of the quantification is deemed necessary for AP29(32) then it is necessary for the other six properties as well. the others as well. All of these have the quantification (0,n:0,n) many to many.

These properties are:

AP1<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP1_produced_(was> produced (was produced by): S11<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_S11_Amount_of> Amount of Matter


AP2<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP2_discarded_into> discarded (was discarded by): S11<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_S11_Amount_of> Amount of Matter


AP4<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP4_produced_surface> produced surface (was surface produced by): A10 Excavation Interface


AP5<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP5_removed_part> removed part or all of (was partially or totally removed by): A8<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit> Stratigraphic Unit


AP6<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP6_intended_to> intended to approximate (was approximated by): A3<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_A3_Stratigraphic_Interface> Stratigraphic Interface


AP10<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_AP10_destroyed_(was> destroyed (was destroyed by): S22<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2022/CRMarchaeo_v1.5.0_draft%20updated%2026-01-2022%20according%20to%20the%20issues%20446%20and%20447%20among%20others%20Comments%20added.docx#_S22_Segment_of> Segment of Matter


Best,

Chriistian-Emil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20220508/c4c88be2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list