[Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo

Zoe Schubert zoe.schubert at uni-koeln.de
Wed Mar 30 01:10:25 EEST 2022

Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 23.03.2022 um 14:24 schrieb George Bruseker via Crm-sig <crm-sig at ics.forth.gr>:

> Dear all,
> I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo. Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are actually essential to its implementation, those properties are not (I believe) expressed in the RDF that comes with CRM Archaeo. Is there a hidden PC file for CRM Archaeo or does everyone generate their own? Should it have an official version? This seems important in terms of the property classes being given the same nomenclature etc or interoperability. 
> Maybe I missed them on the site.
> Best,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1015 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20220330/b9443b85/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list