[Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

Pat Riva pat.riva at concordia.ca
Sat Mar 26 22:44:30 EET 2022


Yes

Pat Riva
Acting University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim
Concordia University / Université Concordia
1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331
Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8
Canada
pat.riva at concordia.ca


________________________________
From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig <crm-sig at ics.forth.gr>
Sent: March 21, 2022 7:24 AM
To: crm-sig <Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr>
Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)


Dear all,

As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.

In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to change the quantification of  appears in, restricted to, typical for to many-to-many, as well as redraft their scope notes. The properties will be assigned the following AP numbers:

  *   AP29 appears in
  *   AP30 restricted to
  *   AP31 typical for

The new scope notes<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcidoc-crm.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F294_0.docx&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7C33cd07a3ec5b4c431f0508da0b2e1676%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637834590570922019%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=oGUSdF%2BpTMSfMsjauVNhtfyErw3wGAOyikfep%2B6gfMM%3D&reserved=0> are working definitions. The relations among types (issue 407<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cidoc-crm.org%2FIssue%2FID-407-ordinal-property-for-e55-type&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7C33cd07a3ec5b4c431f0508da0b2e1676%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637834590570922019%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ft52KVqMr5YvvDIqYgj6pBnY5UiKF7bGuWKtyskEsys%3D&reserved=0>)  be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.

HW: SdS to edit them.

The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a the end of this email:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fdrive%2Ffolders%2F1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7C33cd07a3ec5b4c431f0508da0b2e1676%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637834590570922019%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=MbmgLOR4fw5fFclxxL13lS1J6WB47G5Tm1MUXzfbnYA%3D&reserved=0>


You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the inverses which will be a separate e-vote)


YES if you accept the edited texts

NO if you don't accept the edited texts

VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state


The voting is open until 4th April.


Best,

Christian-Emil



294: E55 Type relations
The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it easier to follow the differences.

OLD
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within this period. The
generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological or other processes.
This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of the class of object in the
archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological observations: If the genesis of an
object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the context in which it
was found, then the statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus,
that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with one of the instance of E4
Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’ properties.

NEW
AP29 appears in
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty:
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been brought into existence during
this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human, biological, geological or other
processes.
This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the associated object kind in the
archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type can plausibly be assumed to
fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then this property supports
reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms part of, or overlaps with,
one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has appeared. Such weak
statements may also be useful in the context of geological or paleontological observations.
Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and AP31 typical for.

OLD
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an instance of E4
Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been generated in this period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the kind of object in the
observation record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been pushed into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties ‘typical for’ and ‘appears in’.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

NEW
AP30 restricted to
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated exclusively in this
period.
This property makes a strong statement concerning the distribution of the associated object kind in
the observed record: If the genesis of an object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within
the genesis of the context in which it was found, then the statement made with this property would
support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the find context actually forms part of
the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps with it.
In contrast, objects from previous periods may appear in a context because they are still in use,
and objects from later periods may have been displaced into an older context.
Weaker claims can be made using the properties AP29 appears in and AP31 typical for.

In First Order Logic:
[…]
AP30(x,y) ∧ AP30(x,z) ⇒ P132(y,z)

OLD
AP31 typical for
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) to an instance
of E4 Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in this period in
significantly higher numbers and wider distribution, than in other periods.
This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the kind of object in the
observation record: If a sufficient number of objects of this type are found in some context, and
their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find context, then the
statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period
of the find context is likely to forms part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least overlaps
with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind in the find context is
compatible with the general density this kind of object had in the respective period in comparable
contexts and deposition history.
A stronger claim can be made using ‘restricted to’ while a weaker claim is made using ‘appears
in'.

NEW
AP31 typical for
Domain: E55 Type
Range: E4 Period
Subproperty: AP29 appears in
Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55 Type) with an
instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been generated in this period in
significantly greater numbers and in wider distributions, than in other periods.
This property makes a moderate statement concerning the distribution of the associated object
kind in the observed record: If a "sufficient number" of objects of this type are found in a context,
and their genesis can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of the find context, then the
statement made with this property would support reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis
period of the find context is likely to form part of the related instance of E4 Period, or at least
overlap with it. “Sufficient number” means that the density of objects of this kind in the find
context is compatible with the general density that this kind of object had during the associated
period in contexts of a comparable nature and deposition history.
A stronger claim can be made using AP30 restricted to while a weaker claim would use AP29
appears in.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20220326/3f07044f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list