[Crm-sig] New Issue: Common Policy / Method for Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

Martin Doerr martin at ics.forth.gr
Thu Mar 24 14:47:13 EET 2022

I think this is a good idea!


On 3/24/2022 1:23 PM, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear George, all,
> The new version of PC classes file (for CRMbase version 7.1.1) has 
> been already produced (as discussed in the last meeting) and will be 
> soon available through the crm website (see issue 567 
> <https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-567-module-for-pc-properties>).
> Thinking of it again:
> Since the namespace for the PC classes is the same with that of the 
> base classes/properties, why not including them directly within the 
> base RDFS? (i.e. providing at the end a single rdfs file that also 
> includes the PCs).
> Properties of properties are part of the official documentation (of 
> the base model, or of an extension), so why not including the 
> corresponding PC classes in the same RDFS file instead of providing 
> and maintaining a second file? (this applies for both the base model 
> and the extensions)
> This is just a suggestion without knowing any discussions, or 
> decisions made, when implementing the PC classes for the first time 
> several years ago (there might be a good reason for having a second 
> file...).
> Best regards,
> Pavlos
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:41 AM George Bruseker via Crm-sig 
> <crm-sig at ics.forth.gr> wrote:
>     Dear all,
>     Subsequent to another thread I started here I am proposing that
>     there be a conversation about having a standard policy and method
>     for creating, documenting and making available the .1 properties
>     for base and its extensions in the RDF serialization. At present
>     to my knowledge the PC classes are only available for CRMBase and
>     relative to version 6.2.1. Other extensions however also use .1
>     constructions and, moreover, CRMbase moves forward and its PC
>     classes should hypothetically move with it. Therefore, I propose
>     we discuss, create and implement a common policy for creating this
>     rdf derivative to support rdf implementations that adopt the .1
>     constructions.
>     Best,
>     George
>     _______________________________________________
>     Crm-sig mailing list
>     Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
>     http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> -- 
> Pavlos Fafalios
> Postdoctoral researcher (Marie Curie IF - Project ReKnow 
> <https://reknow.ics.forth.gr/>)
> Centre for Cultural Informatics & Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science - FORTH
> and
> Visiting Lecturer
> Department of Management Science & Technology
> Hellenic Mediterranean University
> Address: N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
> Email: fafalios at ics.forth.gr
> Tel: +30-2810-391619
> Web: http://users.ics.forth.gr/~fafalios/
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

  Dr. Martin Doerr
  Honorary Head of the
  Center for Cultural Informatics
  Information Systems Laboratory
  Institute of Computer Science
  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
  Email:martin at ics.forth.gr   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20220324/f75d0e36/attachment.html>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list