[Crm-sig] More .1 Questions CRMArchaeo
george.bruseker at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 15:24:40 EET 2022
I am also wondering about implementing .1 constructs in CRM Archaeo.
Although CRM Archaeo declares .1 properties that are actually essential to
its implementation, those properties are not (I believe) expressed in the
RDF that comes with CRM Archaeo. Is there a hidden PC file for CRM Archaeo
or does everyone generate their own? Should it have an official version?
This seems important in terms of the property classes being given the same
nomenclature etc or interoperability.
Maybe I missed them on the site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Crm-sig