[Crm-sig] About ... entity of Type?
martin at ics.forth.gr
Sat Jan 1 18:39:27 EET 2022
I think this is a very good idea. There are thousands of archaeological
publications listing items etc. of certain types, often with reference
to museums keeping them, but library practice will only register overall
aboutness. Museum records cite such publications explicitly, but the
inverse has never been exploited systematically.
On 12/14/2021 6:55 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
> better phrasing, 'about a particular thing that is known categorically'
> Eg Sales Record about 'Sale Event'
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:53 PM George Bruseker
> <george.bruseker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> Recently work is on-going on a new property 'represents thing of
> type' which is distinct from 'represents' (again that particular
> vs categorical distinction).
> I am confronted with cases of an information object being about
> not a particular thing but a category of thing... in my case event
> types but I guess it could be object types. Of course the existing
> 'about' property is sufficient but it doesn't allow to
> differentiate that it is not just a type but about an as yet
> unknown X which was of type Y... It seems to me similar to the
> other new property we are working on already.
> Does anybody else have cases like this? Any interest in a new
> parallel property like that OR a solution that requires no new
> properties but also doesn't require semantic back flips to understand?
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
Email:martin at ics.forth.gr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Crm-sig