[Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM URI management

George Bruseker george.bruseker at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 14:09:25 EET 2020


Dear all,

I agree that this is an ongoing issue that creates barriers to uptake
because of confusion. It is an oft repeated question and deserves a clear
answer. We need a solution based on community wide best practice.
Suggestions?

Best,

George

On Thu., Jan. 16, 2020, 12:51 p.m. Francesco Beretta, <
francesco.beretta at cnrs.fr> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have a question about CIDOC CRM URI management.
>
>
> The last published version of CRMbase is 6.2.1. If I take the RDF
> serialization, I find this base URI:
>
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/
>
>
> If I sent this URI in the web:
>
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E92_Spacetime_Volume
>
> I have an error message.
>
>
> If I sent this URI in the web:
>
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E5_Event
>
> I'm dereferenced on verson 5.0.4.
>
>
> The machine cannot know which version of CRM is considered.
>
>
> I have then the Erlangen URI:
>
> http://erlangen-crm.org/current/E92_Spacetime_Volume
>
> dereferencing on a document of the whole version.
>
> There are additional, earlier specific versions.
>
>
> I have an issue in OntoME: which URI is to be used ?
>
>
> We have a provisional, not dereferenced URI:
>
>
> https://dataforhistory.org/external-ontology/cidoc-crm-base-6-2/E92_Spacetime_Volume
>
> It is there to avoid confusion but it's bad practice.
>
>
> I'm asking myself what to do, and people adopting the CRM are asking me
> these kind of questions, beeing not happy with this situation.
>
>
> I think there was already a discussion about this point in the SIG.
>
> Shouldn't we find, and implement, a solution that meets current
> requirements?
>
> The same issue is raised of course about the extensions familiy.
>
>
> Best
>
> Francesco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20200116/fa2e2884/attachment.html>


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list