[Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE
thanasis at softicon.co.uk
Mon Jan 13 11:57:43 EET 2020
I vote YES as well.
On 12/01/2020 10:13, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear All,
> If you agree that
> "the following Allen's temporal relations should be deprecated in the
> CRMbase and reappear in CRMarcheo:
> P114 is equal in time to
> P115 finishes (is finished by)
> P116 starts (is started by)
> P117 occurs during (includes)
> P118 overlaps in time with (is overlapped in time by)
> P119 meets in time with (is met in time by)
> P120 occurs before (occurs after)"
> PLEASE VOTE "YES"
> otherwise "NO"
> On 1/12/2020 10:29 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> In the October 2019 meeting in Iraklio, we did a general cleanup of
>> the CRM-document based on Martin's and my general review. It was a
>> general understanding that the SIG had decided that the following
>> temporal relations should be deprecated in the CRMbase and reappear in
>> P114 is equal in time to
>> P115 finishes (is finished by)
>> P116 starts (is started by)
>> P117 occurs during (includes)
>> P118 overlaps in time with (is overlapped in time by)
>> P119 meets in time with (is met in time by)
>> P120 occurs before (occurs after)
>> However, I cannot find any traces of such a decision neither in the
>> amendment part, in the minutes the previous two years nor in the list
>> of issues.
>> I suggest that this decision could be done by email vote.
>> Crm-sig mailing list
>> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> Dr. Martin Doerr
> Honorary Head of the
> Center for Cultural Informatics
> Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
> N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
> GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
> Email:martin at ics.forth.gr
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
More information about the Crm-sig