[Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE

[Francesco Beretta]

Dear Martin and Christian-Emil,

1. is there any replacement foreseen for these quite useful properties 
in CRMbase ?

2. for the sake of clear documentation and legacy the vote proposal 
should be associated with the list and links to the correspondent 
issues, shouldn't it ?

3. I'm quite in favour of this vision of a core (CRMbase) and extensions 
(the family) but shouldn't we start working on a clear formalization of 
this integration (cf. e.g. the TEI) – or is this already done and I just 
don't know where to find it ?

4. One aspect of this task is to have a consistent URI definitions and 
dereferencing for CRMbase and family and their different versions.


I think point 1 and 2 should be clarified to the voters before we vote. 
Just avoir B..x.. situations.


All the best

Francesco


Le 12.01.20 à 11:13, Martin Doerr a écrit :
> Dear All,
>
> If you agree that
>
> "the following Allen's temporal relations should be deprecated in the 
> CRMbase and reappear in CRMarcheo:
>
> P114 is equal in time to
> P115 finishes (is finished by)
> P116 starts (is started by)
> P117 occurs during (includes)
> P118 overlaps in time with (is overlapped in time by)
> P119 meets in time with (is met in time by)
> P120 occurs before (occurs after)"
> PLEASE VOTE "YES"
> otherwise "NO"
> Best,
> Martin
>
> On 1/12/2020 10:29 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> In the October 2019 meeting in Iraklio, we did a general cleanup of 
>> the CRM-document based on Martin's and my general review. It was a 
>> general understanding that the  SIG had decided that the following 
>> temporal relations should be deprecated in the CRMbase and reappear 
>> in CRMarcheo:
>> P114 is equal in time to
>> P115 finishes (is finished by)
>> P116 starts (is started by)
>> P117 occurs during (includes)
>> P118 overlaps in time with (is overlapped in time by)
>> P119 meets in time with (is met in time by)
>> P120 occurs before (occurs after)
>>
>> However, I cannot find any traces of such a decision neither in the 
>> amendment part, in the minutes the previous two years nor in the list 
>> of issues.
>>
>> I suggest that this decision could be done by email vote.
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian-Emil
>>
>>
>> ​
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crm-sig mailing list
>> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
>> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20200112/cfc041a0/attachment.html>