[Crm-sig] Issue Visual Item 3D

[Robert Sanderson]

+1 -- in Linked Art we have already adopted this approach :)

(I think we already discussed in the SIG?)

R



On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:31 PM Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I believe that E36 Visual Item should include the surface of statues.
> Therefore,
> I propose to change the scope note to:
>
> *NEW:*
> This class comprises the intellectual or conceptual aspects of
> recognisable marks*, images and other visual works.*
>
> This class does not intend to describe the idiosyncratic characteristics
> of an individual physical embodiment of a visual item, but the underlying
> prototype. For example, a mark such as the ICOM logo is generally
> considered to be the same logo when used on any number of publications. The
> size, orientation and colour may change, but the logo remains uniquely
> identifiable. The same is true of images that are reproduced many times.
> This means that visual items are independent of their physical support.
>
>  The class E36 Visual Item provides a means of identifying and linking
> together instances of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing that carry the same
> visual symbols, marks or images etc. The property *P62 depicts (is
> depicted by)* between E24 Physical Human-Made Thing and depicted subjects
> (E1 CRM Entity) is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E24
> Physical Human-Made Thing through *P65 shows visual item (is shown by)*,
> E36 Visual Item, *P138 represents (has representation)* to E1CRM Entity,
> which in addition captures the optical features of the depiction.
>
> -----
>
> And add the example:
>
> "The surface shape of Auguste Rodin's statue "Le Penseur" [there exist
> more than 20 copies, even of different size]
>
>
> *OLD:  *
>
> This class comprises the intellectual or conceptual aspects of
> recognisable marks, and visual  images.
>
> This class does not intend to describe the idiosyncratic characteristics
> of an individual physical embodiment of a visual item, but the underlying
> prototype. For example, a mark such as the ICOM logo is generally
> considered to be the same logo when used on any number of publications. The
> size, orientation and colour may change, but the logo remains uniquely
> identifiable. The same is true of images that are reproduced many times.
> This means that visual items are independent of their physical support.
>
>
>
> The class E36 Visual Item provides a means of identifying and linking
> together instances of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing that carry the same
> visual symbols, marks or images etc. The property *P62 depicts (is
> depicted by)* between E24 Physical Human-Made Thing and depicted subjects
> (E1 CRM Entity) is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E24
> Physical Human-Made Thing through *P65 shows visual item (is shown by)*,
> E36 Visual Item, *P138 represents (has representation)* to E1CRM Entity,
> which in addition captures the optical features of the depiction.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr
>
>  Honorary Head of the
>  Center for Cultural Informatics
>
>  Information Systems Laboratory
>  Institute of Computer Science
>  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
>
>  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
>  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
>
>  Vox:+30(2810)391625
>  Email: martin at ics.forth.gr
>  Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata
Yale University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20201210/0c6ead57/attachment-0001.html>