[Crm-sig] Space time volumes

Dan Matei Dan at cimec.ro
Wed Mar 20 15:59:52 EET 2019


Thanks Christian-Emil and Martin.

I will use then E4 and P7 (regretfully :-)

My impression is that the combination E92, P160 & P161 is a more elegant solution. But, rules are 
rules...

Best,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:13:52 +0200

> As Christian-Emil also pointed out, this is a wrong use of E92.
> 
> The scope note says: "This class comprises 4 dimensional point sets 
> (volumes) in physical spacetime....".
> 
> Do you regard that what makes up the identity and substance of the 
> Byzantine Period is to be a set of points?
> 
> best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 3/19/2019 10:27 AM, Dan Matei wrote:
> > Hi fiends,
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 19:20, Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Nevertheless, we used the term informally in the CRM. We could name E92 as "abstract".
> > For me, some E92 are not abstract. E.g. I instantiate "Byzantine
> > Period" (it is somwhat difficult to place it in South America :-) :
> >
> > <#ByzantinePeriod> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
> > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <330-1700>
> > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#EsternEurope>
> > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Levant>
> > <#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#NorthAfrica>
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > <#BronzeAge1> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
> > <#BronzeAge1> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept>
> > <#BronzeAge1> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?1>
> > <#BronzeAge1><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#JapaneseIslands>
> >
> > <#BronzeAge2> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
> > <#BronzeAge2> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept>
> > <#BronzeAge2> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?2>
> > <#BronzeAge2><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Scandinavia>
> >
> > Should I worry ?
> >
> > Dan




More information about the Crm-sig mailing list