[Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist"
RSanderson at getty.edu
Thu Mar 7 23:02:33 EET 2019
One thing to note about the dbpedia ontology is that it is derived from the infobox sections of Wikipedia, mostly automatically.
So this could be a very artificial alignment, and I would not put too much emphasis on it as a precedent.
From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr>
Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 10:07 AM
To: crm-sig <Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr>
Subject: [Crm-sig] Issue 277 "artist"
For the test about types there was a question in which context a class "Artist" may have been defined. I found one in dbpedia:
I am not sure how to refer to this in our text. One may point to the utility of replacing classes with types for the mapping.
Reading the properties of this artist definition carefully, one may ask which of those are actually be restricted to artists, and which "make artists" out of a person: the awards. The latter is obviously common reasoning, but we would not populate the CRM with such secondary concepts for reasons of maintaining a core.
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
Email: martin at ics.forth.gr<mailto:martin at ics.forth.gr>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Crm-sig