[Crm-sig] ISSUE: Is P181 has amount different from P90 has value?
martin at ics.forth.gr
Sat Dec 7 21:28:31 EET 2019
Indeed! P180 already specializes what kind of unit a monetary amount can
On 12/6/2019 10:48 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> Dear all,
> Is P181_has_amount really a useful property, compared to its
> super-property of P90_has_value?
> They both take numbers, 181 is a subproperty of 90 just as 97 is a
> subclass of 54. Their scope notes do not describe any semantic
> difference between them, as far as I can tell:
> P90: This property allows an instance of E54 Dimension to be
> approximated by an instance of E60 Number primitive.
> P181: This property establishes the relationship between an instance
> of E97 Monetary Amount and the amount of currency, an instance of E60
> Number, that it consists of.
> As there is no specialization occurring, I do not believe that P181 is
> in any way different from P90 and thus we should just use P90 with
> Monetary Amounts and remove P181.
> Many thanks!
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
Email: martin at ics.forth.gr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Crm-sig