[Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework

Stephen Stead steads at paveprime.com
Mon Jan 8 21:38:09 EET 2018

I agree that would be helpful.


Stephen Stead

Tel +44 20 8668 3075 

Mob +44 7802 755 013

E-mail  <mailto:steads at paveprime.com> steads at paveprime.com

LinkedIn Profile  <https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/> https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/


From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Øyvind Eide
Sent: 08 January 2018 14:35
To: crm-sig <Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr>
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework


Dear Martin, and all,


it looks good to me. Given the deprecation of E84 it could be nice to add a sentence to the scope note of E24, something like:


”Instances of this class can act as carriers of instances of E73 Information Object.”






Am 04.01.2018 um 18:39 schrieb Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr <mailto:martin at ics.forth.gr> >:


Dear All,

Here my proposals:

"ISSUE 295

Following Martin’s proposal to remove class E84 since it does not satisfy the requirements proposed on issue 340, the sig proposed the examples of material carrier of a digital object to be moved to E24 of an E25 digital feature and possibly to E78 οr put example for E78 of Server holding Digital Asset Management.

Finally, the sig asked Martin to make an example. The issue will be complete with examples. It is decided to be created a new issue for covering the discussion about  E84 staying or going"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20180108/5efa1d05/attachment.html>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list