[Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Richard P Smiraglia
smiragli at uwm.edu
Thu Jan 4 19:28:25 EET 2018
A
Richard P. Smiraglia, Professor, Knowledge Organization Research Group
School of Information Studies
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
and Editor-in-Chief, Knowledge Organization
smiragli at uwm.edu
________________________________
From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Martin Doerr <martin at ics.forth.gr>
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:31 AM
To: crm-sig
Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Dear All,
Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse also the order of the two labels?:
e.g.:
A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of (has translation)
OR
B) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i has translation (is translation of) ?
PLEASE VOTE A or B.
Best,
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: martin at ics.forth.gr<mailto:martin at ics.forth.gr> |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20180104/9b5f97b2/attachment.html>
More information about the Crm-sig
mailing list