[Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE
Martin Doerr
martin at ics.forth.gr
Thu Jan 4 17:31:35 EET 2018
Dear All,
Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for
inverse also the order of the two labels?:
e.g.:
A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of
(has translation)
OR
B) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i has translation (is
translation of) ?
PLEASE VOTE A or B.
Best,
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20180104/717ea771/attachment.html>
More information about the Crm-sig
mailing list