[Crm-sig] CRM Methodology PLEASE READ AND COMMENT
Philip.Carlisle at HistoricEngland.org.uk
Thu Jan 4 16:42:04 EET 2018
I agree the Examples need to be clearer especially those using symbols.
I took the ‘+’ and ‘-‘ to mean that one example was a good/positive example whereas the other was an example of what you shouldn’t do (bad/negative).
Are the symbols meant to do the same? If so can we standardize or provide a legend to clarify what is intended? Even include an annotated example of a principle perhaps.
Knowledge Organization Specialist
Listing Group, Historic England
Direct Dial: +44 (0)1793 414824
Listing Information Services fosters an environment where colleagues are valued for their skills and knowledge, and where communication, customer focus and working in partnership are at the heart of everything we do.
[Historic England Logo]<http://www.historicengland.org.uk/>
We help people understand, enjoy and value the historic environment, and protect it for the future. Historic England<http://bit.ly/1OuxROd> is a public body, and we champion everyone’s heritage, across England.
Follow us: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/HistoricEngland> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HistoricEngland> | Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/historicengland/> Sign up to our newsletter<http://bit.ly/1p49z1e>
Help us create a list of the 100 places which tell England's remarkable story and its impact on the world. A History of England in 100 Places<https://historicengland.org.uk/100places> sponsored by Ecclesiastical<http://www.ecclesiastical.com/fororganisations/insurance/heritageinsurance/100-places/index.aspx>.
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of Historic England unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to Historic England may become publicly available.
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Richard Light
Sent: 04 January 2018 12:50
To: crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] CRM Methodology PLEASE READ AND COMMENT
On 14/12/2017 21:48, Martin Doerr wrote:
This statement "some of the examples provided are currently too cryptic to be helpful." is too general to be helpful ;-);-)...please tell us which ones:-)
As a general point I don't understand why there are two 'Eg' sections for each principle. Some have a screen icon by the first and a mouse icon by the second; others have '+' by the first and '-' by the second. Is it that you would like there to be two examples for each principle, or do they play different roles? (In some, e.g. 1.2, there are two points in the first Eg and none in the second, suggesting they serve different purposes.)
* 2.1 TADIRAH "Research Object" needs a note explaining (presumably) that the research intention has no impact on an object being a member of the "object" class
* 6.4 Getty’s ‘Object ID’, the EAD - what do these demonstrate as regards mandatory/optional properties?
* 7.1 both examples here are too cryptic: please explain what they show/what should be done with them
* 7.2 is the first part of the second Eg making a different point to the first Eg? If so, it's not clear what it is. Second part of second Eg also cryptic
* 7.3 examples are unexplained, though I get the general idea. The re-appearance of "Research Object" (TADIRAH) also raises the question whether 7.3 is different in substance from 2.1
* 7.4 "hamlet - village" looks like a completion of the first Eg; it's not clear what we're advising to do about "ship - boat"
* 8.1 isn't the second Eg the conclusion of the first one?
* 8.2 the purpose of the second set of Egs isn't clear
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6074 bytes
More information about the Crm-sig