[Crm-sig] Quick question: In response to naysayers in DPLA discussion....
Jim Salmons
jim.salmons at factminers.org
Wed Jul 6 06:08:59 EEST 2016
Hello CRM SIG folk,
In a Twitter exchange where I expressed my disappointment in the closed
membership and non-transparent nature of the DPLA ADWG (Archival Description
Working Group), and disappointment in the recently posted Developer for Data
and Usage Analytics job posting (https://goo.gl/rhckCk) not recognizing
international standards such as the #cidocCRM, there has been a strong
condemnation of the #cidocCRM stating that it not be taken seriously because
"there are no major scalable production systems after all these years"
(https://twitter.com/ewg118/status/750519840545398786).
As my interest, research, and limited professional exposure is not in this
realm of "major scalable production systems," I would appreciate any advice
for examples to counter this opinion.
Thank you,
Happy-Healthy Vibes,
-: Jim :-
Jim Salmons and Timlynn Babitsky
Twitter: @Jim_Salmons, @TimlynnBabitsky, @FactMiners, @Softalk_Apple
www.FactMiners.org <http://www.FactMiners.org> (Our #CitizenScience
project)
www.SoftalkApple.com <http://www.SoftalkApple.com> (Our #DigitalHistory
project)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20160705/a5fc32ae/attachment.html>
More information about the Crm-sig
mailing list