[Crm-sig] HomeWork, ISSUE 276, P49

martin martin at ics.forth.gr
Mon Oct 5 17:02:28 EEST 2015

Dear All,



This shortcut supposes the existence of at least one representative part 
standing physically for the whole. Discuss knowledge revision process if 
a piece taken to be the representative of the whole must be regarded 
piece of another. Things kept may have parts in other hands.

A comment should be stated. Steve, MD, Athinak should think together

I propose the scope note addition:

Scope note:This property identifies the E39 Actor or Actors who have or 
have had custody of an instance of E18 Physical Thing at some time. This 
property leaves open the question if parts of this physical thing have 
been added or removed during the time-spans it has been under the 
custody of this actor, but it is required that at least a part which can 
unambiguously be identified as representing the whole has been under 
this custody for its whole time. For instance, in the extreme case of a 
set of cutlery we may require the majority of pieces having been in the 
hands of the actor.




  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
  Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                                |  Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
                Center for Cultural Informatics               |
                Information Systems Laboratory                |
                 Institute of Computer Science                |
    Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
                 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
              Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl           |

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20151005/b61b7278/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list