[Crm-sig] FRBRoo published in IFLA namespace

Dan Matei Dan at cimec.ro
Fri Feb 13 12:55:06 EET 2015


As a (daily) user of CRM, I'm very much against criptic labels. I'm too old to remember the numbers in labels :-(

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: martin <martin at ics.forth.gr>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:38:15 +0200

> That is an interesting comment. Anyway, the labels are in a European 
> language.
> We have proposed in the past that the generic RDF property labels are 
> the E / P numbers,
> and that language labels are display properties. That's why we have the 
> E/ P numbers,
> which are as robust as anything in this world can be, but pople voted not to
> have naked E-Pnumbers in RDFS. So, we cannot control ISO. We can
> declare to be smarter than ISO and stick at will to our labels. Or, we 
> finally admit that
> user tools should have the ability to display the language lables, and 
> not the generic ones,
> and change the master RDF.




More information about the Crm-sig mailing list