[Crm-sig] Issue 233
martin
martin at ics.forth.gr
Thu Mar 27 20:34:08 EET 2014
Dear All,
posted by Athina8/10/2014 :
In my opinion, the scope note of E75 Conceptual Object Appellation
should be more clear, in order to justify the reason for specializing
E41 Appellation to E75, and additionally, in order to understand for
example, what is the conceptual difference (and the necessity/scope of
the distinction) between E35 and E75 for example, which resulted in this
classification (and specialisation of E41 at the same time).
think about this,
RGs
Athina Kritsotaki
E75 now:
E75 Conceptual Object Appellation
**
Subclass of: E41 <#_E41_Appellation> Appellation**
Scope note:This class comprises all appellations specific to
intellectual products or standardized patterns.
Examples:
*"ISBN 3-7913-1418-1"
*"ISO 2788-1986 (F)"
Proposed scope note:
" This class comprises appellations that are by their form or syntax
specific to identifying instances of
E28 Conceptual Object, such as intellectual products, standardized
patterns etc."
Examples:
§"ISBN 3-7913-1418-1"
§"ISO 2788-1986 (F)"
* "DOI=10.1109/MIS.2007.103"
Best,
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20140327/eb9eb4c9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Crm-sig
mailing list