[Crm-sig] Issue 233

martin martin at ics.forth.gr
Thu Mar 27 20:34:08 EET 2014

Dear All,

posted by Athina8/10/2014 :
In my opinion, the scope note of E75 Conceptual Object Appellation 
should be more clear, in order to justify the reason for specializing 
E41 Appellation to E75, and additionally, in order to understand for 
example, what is the conceptual difference (and the necessity/scope of 
the distinction) between E35 and E75 for example, which resulted in this 
classification (and specialisation of E41 at the same time).

think about this,
Athina Kritsotaki

E75 now:

      E75 Conceptual Object Appellation


Subclass of: E41 <#_E41_Appellation> Appellation**

Scope note:This class comprises all appellations specific to 
intellectual products or standardized patterns.


*"ISBN 3-7913-1418-1"

*"ISO 2788-1986 (F)"

Proposed scope note:
" This class comprises appellations that are by their form or syntax 
specific to identifying instances of
E28 Conceptual Object, such as intellectual products, standardized 
patterns etc."

§"ISBN 3-7913-1418-1"

§"ISO 2788-1986 (F)"

* "DOI=10.1109/MIS.2007.103"




  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
  Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                                |  Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
                Center for Cultural Informatics               |
                Information Systems Laboratory                |
                 Institute of Computer Science                |
    Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
                 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
              Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl           |

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20140327/eb9eb4c9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list