[Crm-sig] FRBR 2.0 error checking

Stephen Stead steads at paveprime.com
Wed Jun 18 14:57:28 EEST 2014

I agree with the editing summarised in Note 1.
The second item is probably an error in our thinking. To say that the
relationship between an F22 Self Contained Expression and a E90 Symbolic
Object it contains, is a sub-property of the part-whole relationship of E89
Propositional Object's is quite obviously nonsense.
Good catch!

Stephen Stead
Tel +44 20 8668 3075 
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail steads at paveprime.com
LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads

-----Original Message-----
From: Crm-sig [mailto:crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr] On Behalf Of Chryssoula
Sent: 18 June 2014 10:34
To: FRBR Group; crm-sig
Subject: [Crm-sig] FRBR 2.0 error checking

Dear All
During the Updating and validation process  of  the last version of FRBR
2.0 with the discussions we had in Hague,  two errors have been noticed.
The first error is just a proofreading error and concerns the updating of
the scope note of R6 carries (is carried by). Please vote if you agree with
the change  (see note 1, in  the attachment) The second error is a semantic
error and concerns the subtyping of property R14 incorporates (is
incorporated in) (see note 2 in the attachment).
For the moment, we took back the statement that R14 isA P148, and it remains
for discussion in the next meeting or through email

best regards


Chryssoula Bekiari
Research and Development Engineer

Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory Institute
of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp
E-mail: bekiari at ics.forth.gr


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list