[Crm-sig] *** ISSUE *** Revision of scope note for E73 Information Object to specifically include named graphs

Richard Light richard at light.demon.co.uk
Tue Jul 29 16:34:34 EEST 2014


On 29/07/2014 13:44, martin wrote:
>>
>> So, in what way would you create a Named Graph (in your sense) for 
>> the AAT?  What URI would you associate with each triple in the 
>> concept scheme? 
> http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/
>> And what practical benefit does this give you, that simply using the 
>> URL quoted above doesn't give you?
> You can upload the AAT into a triple store and still know this is the 
> same AAT...
>
> An example of a "well known" graph will always have that problem - it 
> is defined somewhere else.
> In the CRM, we do not require examples to be well known. We can create 
> a small TRIG file.
>
> The whole point of a Named Graph is distinguishing a bunch of 
> propositions within a database (triple store,
> graph database...). If the propositions are still on the Getty server, 
> I cannot run a transitive closure etc. on its
> content.
OK, thanks for your patience: I see now.

Richard
-- 
*Richard Light*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20140729/05e6b1a1/attachment.html>


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list