[Crm-sig] ISSUE 239

Barry Norton BNorton at britishmuseum.org
Mon Apr 14 17:24:00 EEST 2014

Richard, I don't think I've seen that, and I believe I made some commitment to help on publishing and versioning at the last meeting. Could you share you suggestion?



From: Crm-sig [crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr] on behalf of Richard Light [richard at light.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 14 April 2014 15:03
To: crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 239


In order for this policy to be of practical value, we will need a working mechanism which allows users to specify in their Linked Data URLs which version of the CRM RDFS they mean, with a fallback approach which always gives them the current official release.  I made suggestions towards such a mechanism, in recent correspondence with Martin and Christos.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20140414/691e919f/attachment.html>

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list