[Crm-sig] CORRECTION new issue the scope note for P134 continued, NOT P10
c.e.s.ore at iln.uio.no
Sun Oct 20 12:27:53 EEST 2013
In the study of issue 195, I did a close reading of the scope note of
"This property allows two activities to be related where the domain is
considered as an intentional continuation of the range.
Used multiple times, this allows a chain of related activities to be
created which follow each other in sequence."
Assume ‘A P134 continued B’. The first part of the scope note does not
mention time or sequence. Thus, even though B occurs in time within A, A
could be seen as a continuation of B. For example the activities of a
company bought by another company or a country which is taken over by
another country (DDR -> BRD) could be continued by the activities of the
buying firm or the annexing country.
The second sentence at least hits that A has to follow B in time. In
any case A cannot occur before or be equal to B in time.
In general on should check the properties involving time relations and
include information about the allen operators to avoid inconsistencies.
The scope note should be more explicit on the temporal aspect. That is,
include a third paragraph/sentence on the line of
"The property does only subsume that an activity continuing another does
not occur before the other activity in time and is not equal in time .”
More information about the Crm-sig