[Crm-sig] Identifiers for activities about objects

Michael Hopwood michael at editeur.org
Fri Jan 18 12:54:36 EET 2013


Hello Dr. Velios, Josh,

I would also mention CIDOC's recommendation on URIs for objects (if you haven't seen it yet): http://www.cidoc-crm.org/URIs_and_Linked_Open_Data.html

The British Museum's URI pattern makes use of some of the ideas current in LD thinking (e.g. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/) and also embodies some useful metadata principles, e.g. that it doesn't contain more information than necessary about the data that might be built on top of the IDs - in the case of the teapot, were the main part and the lid produced simultaneously?

Giving these events dumb number IDs allows multiple assertions to be made about the events, whether or not they are identical, depending on different assertion sources or changing information; an ID that has too much "intelligence" may not help with that.

Best,

Michael Hopwood
Linked Heritage Project Lead
EDItEUR
United House, North  Road
London N7 9DP
UK

Tel: +44 20 7503 6418
Mob: +44 7811 591036
Skype: michael.hopwood.editeur
http://www.linkedheritage.org/
http://editeur.org/

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender and delete this e-mail immediately. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses, so please scan all attachments. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the company.

EDItEUR Limited is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no 2994705. Registered Office: 
United House, North Road, London N7 9DP, United Kingdom




More information about the Crm-sig mailing list