[Crm-sig] More consistent representation of "dual events"

Wolfgang Schmidle wolfgang.schmidle at uni-koeln.de
Wed Nov 21 16:27:55 EET 2012


Am 21.11.12 10:35, schrieb Vladimir Alexiev:

> I think that Part Removal and Part Addition should be merged.
>
> This will allow more consistent modeling of the following situations:
> - moving an object from one collection to another (similar to E8 and E10):
>    removed=added=<object>, diminished=<old_collection>, augmented=<new_collection>
> - replacing a part of an object (similar to E81):
>    removed=<old_part>, added=<new_part>, diminished=augmented=<object>

What would the generic case mean? For example:
removed=<object1>, diminished=<collectionA>, added=<object2>, 
augmented=<collectionB>

Wolfgang



More information about the Crm-sig mailing list