[Crm-sig] URI to refer to CIDOC-CRM and FRBRoo namespace(s) and concepts?
r.stein at fotomarburg.de
Mon Mar 26 20:47:44 EEST 2012
This requires indeed some official fixing since composing the URI from
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crm-concepts/ plus entity number
was the advice given by ICS-FORTH at the time of delivering LIDO v1.0.
(and the LIDO spec follows it btw consistently, differences below seem
to be due to word-wraps)
Please let us know if these are not valid anymore (which I wouldn't
consider best practice..)
Am 26.03.2012 18:18, schrieb Vladimir Alexiev:
> Hi Michael!
>> The LIDO spec says: "CIDOC-CRM concept definitions are given at
>> http://www.cidoccrm.org/crm-concepts/ Data values in the sub-element term
> may often
>> be: Man-Made Object (with conceptID
>> Man-Made Feature (http://www.cidoc-rm.org/crmconcepts/E25), Collection
> I think this is bad advice on several fronts:
> - I see 4 URLs above, and all 4 are different ;-)
> - It doesn't refer to the official release URI (see below)
> - I think that using numbers only, without the English labels, is calling
> for trouble and errors
> The page http://www.cidoc-crm.org/official_release_cidoc.html lists some
> oficial URIs.
> I would use this one: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/cidoc-crm-english-label
> This URL resolves (following linked data principles) and redirects to the
> current version:
> Martin, I'd suggest several fixes:
> 1. Please make the official URIs into links:
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/cidoc-crm-english-label and
> http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/cidoc-crm .
> 2. Please fix this link later in the page to use the same URI for the
> current version:
> 3. Fix the MIME type returned by the server
> -- currently it is:
> curl --head http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/5.0.4/cidoc-crm-english-label
> Content-Type: text/xml
> -- should be:
> Content-Type: application/rdf+xml
>> Can I just add on the relevant FRBRoo term ID (e.g. F26 for movies) to the
> URI prefix
>> for CRM? E.g. yielding "http://www.cidoccrm.org/crm-concepts/F26"?
> You shouldn't, as these are separate ontologies
>> 2. Is there a URI to denote CIDOC-CRM or FRBRoo itself as the "source" of
>> concept? I.e. the URI for the concept scheme?
> Do you mean SKOS "concept scheme"?
> Cheers! Vladimir
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
More information about the Crm-sig