[Crm-sig] any adequate property to connect E22 with E7?

Agnes Thomas agnes.thomas at uni-koeln.de
Mon Jul 23 15:39:12 EEST 2012


Hi Vladimir,

thanks a lot! I meant more the first definition. I think your way,  
using the E12 production event, should work. We found something  
similar, but I wasn't sure if it would be the correct use of the  
ontology.

Best wishes
Agnes.



Zitat von Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev at ontotext.com>:

>> is there a way to map a possible payer ("Auftraggeber", probably E7
>> actor) for any object of art/architecture etc (E22 Man-Made Object)
>
> Hi Agnes!
> You better define what "possible payer - Auftraggeber" means.
>
> - if he commissioned the creation of the work:
>
> <obj> a E22_Man-Made_Object; P108i_was_produced_by <obj/production>.
> <obj/production> a E12_Production; P17_was_motivated_by <person>.
>
> - if he bought the work:
>
> <obj> a E22_Man-Made_Object; P51_has_former_or_current_owner <person>.
> <obj/acquisition> a E8_Acquisition; P24_transferred_title_of <obj>;  
> P23_transferred_title_to <person>.
>
> You should find http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-graphical useful.
> (I took it from  
> http://cidoc-crm.org/cidoc_graphical_representation_v_5_1/graphical_representaion_5_0_1.html but put it in a single  
> page)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>





More information about the Crm-sig mailing list