[Crm-sig] More consistent representation of "dual events"

Joshan Mahmud joshan.mahmud at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 16:48:51 EET 2012

In addition to Vladimir's question we use these classes always together and I'm not sure when they would be separated.

What would be really helpful is in addition to the comments in the ontology CIDOC provided a range of examples of each predicate and class from a real world 'meaningful' situation to a set of RDF triples.  This would demystify how CRM and should be used.


On 6 Dec 2012, at 14:23, "Vladimir Alexiev" <vladimir.alexiev at ontotext.com> wrote:

>> What would the generic case mean? For example:
>> removed=<object1>, diminished=<collectionA>, added=<object2>, augmented=<collectionB>
> And what do these cases mean?
> Part Removal: removed=<object1>, diminished=<collectionA>, diminished=<collectionB>
> Part Removal: removed=<object1>
> Part Removal: diminished=<collectionA>
> Part Removal: 
> CRM allows you to express situations, but it doesn't force you to express only meaningful situations.
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

More information about the Crm-sig mailing list