[Crm-sig] Call for Comments

Reinhard Foertsch foertsch at uni-koeln.de
Mon May 30 10:56:54 EEST 2011


Hi *,

by the way - in terms of non-openness and just from curiosity: what about datasets/objects in commcercial databases?

RF

--
--
Prof. Dr. Reinhard Foertsch
Universitaet zu Koeln
CoDArchLab
am
Archaeologischen Institut

Albertus Magnus Platz 
D - 50923 Koeln
Fon: 0049/221/470-2946
Fax: 0049/221/470-5099
url: http://www.klassarchaeologie.uni-koeln.de/?q=node/86
AIM-Account for iChat: seezeichen18
@: foertsch at me.com 
.:.:.:.Skype: rfoertsch.:.:.:.

'And remember: Jesus saves, but George Nelson withdraws'



Am 30.05.2011 um 09:32 schrieb Maximilian Schich:

> Hi Regine and all,
> 
> In principle, I think, we can all imagine Linked Data that is non-open - 
> and in house museum inventory databases might be so very likely. But the 
> whole point about publishing identifier URIs for museum objects is that 
> they are available for everybody to cite. So indeed in our case the data 
> should be Linked Open Data.
> 
> Also - notwithstanding my high regard of TBL - just because a concept 
> was introduced by him does not make it more letigimate, just as building 
> reconstructions do not become more realistic if we can attribute them to 
> Andrea Palladio.
> 
> Best, Max
> 
> Dr. Maximilian Schich
> http://www.schich.info
> http://artshumanities.netsci2011.net
> 
> 
> Am 29.05.11 18:13, schrieb Regine Stein:
>> Dear Martin, dear all,
>> 
>> Apologies for the very late comment (however just in time for the
>> deadline May 30th ;-))
>> 
>> I have one simple recommendation: Please replace "Linked Open Data" by
>> "Linked Data" throughout the whole documents (and URL).
>> 
>> First because Linked Data is the original term as it was invented by TBL
>> if I'm not mistaken.
>> 
>> Second because there is a serious debate ongoing on what "Open" means in
>> Linked Open Data.
>> E.g. according to the current view in Europeana office it means that all
>> data to be published as LOD has to be public domain whereas many
>> representatives of Europeana museum projects do question this requirement.
>> 
>> Though this might appear to be a Europeana specific discussion I think
>> there is no point for CIDOC to potentially cause confusion about the issue.
>> 
>> Best wishes
>> Regine
>> 
>> 
>> Am 21.03.2011 17:02, schrieb martin:
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> Your comments on http://www.cidoc-crm.org/URIs_and_Linked_Open_Data.html
>>> will be most welcome!
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/attachments/20110530/f7e27d02/attachment.htm 


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list