[Crm-sig] MARC Relators and FRBR
tbaker at tbaker.de
Wed Mar 31 18:57:21 EEST 2010
If I correctly understand, the relators are on the list of
vocabularies to be re-published as part of the http://ip.loc.gov
program, so they may be open to suggestions along these lines.
Note that the MARC properties were declared in 2005 before
DCMI added ranges to its own properties. A sub-set of
the MARC properties are declared as sub-properties of
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/contributor , which
itself has an unspecified range -- as opposed to the newer
sub-property http://purl.org/dc/terms/contributor, which has
a range of Agent.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:48:59PM +0200, Yann NICOLAS wrote:
> It would be perfect if the schema mentioned the *range* of the relators.
> Le 31/03/2010 16:44, Thomas Baker a écrit :
> >Hi Yann,
> >You may be interested to look at  as described in 
> >-- MARC relators modeled by Library of Congress as RDF
> >properties (after all, an RDF property is by definition a
> >sort of relator -- a relator between the Subject and the
> >Object of an RDF statement...).
> > http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/dc-relators.xml
> > http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/relators/
> >On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:31:46PM +0200, Yann NICOLAS wrote:
> >>does anybody know a mapping between MARC Relators  and FRBRoo entities
> >>Examples :
> >>. /Author// [aut]/ is relevant for the Work class (i should say : for
> >>the "Work Conception" class).
> >>. /Cover designer// [cov]/ is relevant for the Manifestation Class
> >>I can imagine that such a mapping cannot be complete, as many relators
> >>are ambiguous or dependant on the context, but even a partial one would
> >>interest me.
> >>Best regards,
> >>/ http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relaterm.html/
> >>Yann NICOLAS
> >>Département Etudes& Projets
> >>ABES - www.abes.fr
> >>Crm-sig mailing list
> >>Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
> Yann NICOLAS
> Département Etudes& Projets
> ABES - www.abes.fr
Tom Baker <tbaker at tbaker.de>
More information about the Crm-sig