[Crm-sig] ISSUE: CRM text version 2

Christian-Emil Ore c.e.s.ore at iln.uio.no
Tue Mar 30 16:54:53 EEST 2010


Dear all
I don't have the text in front of me. Would it be an idea to hint to how 
the subproperty construct is expressed in say Java?

Chr-Emil

On 30.03.2010 13:49, martin wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> With Steven's help here a modified proposal:
> 
> subproperty:
> ORIGINAL:
> "Some object-oriented languages, such as C++, have no equivalent to the
> specialization of properties".
> 
> BETTER:
> "Some object-oriented programming languages, such as C++, do not contain
> constructs that allow for the expression of the specialization of properties
> as sub-properties"
> 
> shortcut:
> ORIGINAL:
> "The CRM allows shortcuts as cases of less detailed knowledge, while
> preserving in its schema the relationship to the full information."
> 
> BETTER:
> "The CRM declares shortcuts explicitly as single properties in order to
> allow the user to describe cases in which he has less detailed knowledge
> than the full data path would require. For each shortcut the CRM schema
> contains the properties of the full data path that is the equivalent of the
> shortcut."
> 
> PLEASE VOTE.
> 
> 
> 
> PLEASE VOTE



More information about the Crm-sig mailing list