[Crm-sig] Issue: Activity Plan

[Vladimir Ivanov]

One more question:

What is an _execution_ of the Activity Plan?
Is it an E7 Activity or something else?

best regards,
Vladimir

2009/11/5 martin <martin at ics.forth.gr>:
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> How about those (intended) Actors involved in the execution of the
>> Activity Plan?
>
> Actors, Things etc. can be covered by a modification of P12 :
>
> "Activity Plan: foresaw to be present: Persistent Item".
>
> So, with three properties, we can cover all factual relationships of the
> planned Activity.
>
> In general, all properties of an Activity Plan can be regarded as a kind of
> "refers to".
>
> So, talking about kinds of people to participate etc. would not deserve a
> particular property
> to my understanding, since it will not co-refer with any relevant historical
> item.
>
> However, that particular people and things were expected to be somewhere at
> some time might
> quite well be an important information in historical research.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>>
>> best regards,
>> Vladimir
>>
>> 2009/11/4 martin <martin at ics.forth.gr>:
>>>
>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>
>>> "execution was intended for (is intended execution time of) : E52
>>> Time-Span"
>>>
>>> subproperty of "refers to".
>>>
>>> "This property associates an Activity Plan with the future time-span the
>>> planned activity was
>>> intended to be executed. An Activity Plan may or may not foresee a
>>> particular future time-span
>>> of execution."
>>>
>>> Example: Planning an exhibition for certain dates.
>>>
>>> May be we should also provide a link to the venue, and the items to be
>>> present?
>>>
>>> Does that make sense?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> Matthew Stiff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Martin (and sorry for long silence!) :-)
>>>>
>>>> I think this is really useful. One observation is that in practice
>>>> "Activity
>>>> Plans" are often dusted down and reused, but in doing so they have to be
>>>> checked against their applicability to each instance of an activity so
>>>> to
>>>> all intents and purposes they are "new" plans.
>>>>
>>>> I genuinely don't understand what you mean by the second of your
>>>> proposed
>>>> properties - Could you provide a scope note and an example for this and
>>>> I
>>>> will try to think if there is a clearer way of expressing it?
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Matthew
>>>>
>>>> Dr Matthew Stiff
>>>> 19 Riverside Road
>>>> Oxford
>>>> OX2 0HT
>>>>
>>>> (t)           +44 1865 425982
>>>> (m)         +44 7939 151510
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr [mailto:crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of martin
>>>> Sent: 31 October 2009 13:05
>>>> To: crm-sig
>>>> Subject: [Crm-sig] Issue: Activity Plan
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if we should introduce a class "Activity Plan" IsA E29 Design
>>>> or
>>>> Procedure:
>>>>
>>>> Scope note:
>>>>
>>>> This class comprises plans to execute instances of E7 Activity in some
>>>> foreseen future. The planned
>>>> activities may have any degree of complexity or elaboration. Plans may
>>>> be
>>>> made with or without intention
>>>> to execute them, or the intention to execute them may be abandon before
>>>> their execution. The actual
>>>> intention to stick to a plan could be seen as a kind of activity using
>>>> the
>>>> plan.
>>>>
>>>> Properties:
>>>>
>>>> "planned to execute activity of type(is type of activity planned by):
>>>> E55
>>>> Type"
>>>>
>>>> "execution was intended for (is intended execution time of) : E52
>>>> Time-Span"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe this simple model would close the known gap of the CRM to the
>>>> whole world of planning,
>>>> we have so far not addressed, but nevertheless is an integral part also
>>>> of
>>>> historical reasoning.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Comments welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
>>>  Principle Researcher          |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
>>>                               |  Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
>>>                                                             |
>>>               Center for Cultural Informatics               |
>>>               Information Systems Laboratory                |
>>>                Institute of Computer Science                |
>>>   Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
>>>                                                             |
>>>  Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
>>>                                                             |
>>>         Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl               |
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Crm-sig mailing list
>>> Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
>>> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
>  Principle Researcher          |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
>                               |  Email: martin at ics.forth.gr |
>                                                             |
>               Center for Cultural Informatics               |
>               Information Systems Laboratory                |
>                Institute of Computer Science                |
>   Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
>                                                             |
>  Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
>                                                             |
>         Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl               |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>



-- 
С уважением,
Владимир Иванов
--------------------------------------------------
младший научный сотрудник
лаборатории математической и
компьютерной лингвистики
НИИММ им. Н.Г. Чеботарева
Казанский государственный университет