[Crm-sig] ISSUE

Christian-Emil Ore c.e.s.ore at edd.uio.no
Tue Sep 9 21:33:53 EEST 2008



On 09.09.2008 18:18, martin wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I would like to suggest some last issues for the CRM:
> 
> A) Change range of E7 Activity. P20 had specific purpose (was purpose of) from E7 Activity to E5 Events. This would
> allow us to talk about machine events, traps etc., set up by people, but not carried out in the proper sense,
> where even a sense of "cause" may be debatable (the one who set the trap versus the one who triggered). This is
> convenient to describe digital photography and computer "activities". We can still regard that such an event
> is part of an overall Activity, but not an Activity in isolation.
And a change of the scope: Remove the comment involving contrafactive 
history, "the bank going bankrupt before the planned takeover".

Regards,
Christian-Emil
> 
> B) P51 has former or current owner (is former or current owner of) is subproperty P105 right held by (has right on)
> 
> C) P32 used general technique (was technique of) is subproperty of P125 used object of type (was type of object used in)
> 
> D) P56 bears feature (is found on) is subproperty of P46 is composed of (forms part of)
> 
> E) Rename E29 Design or Procedure. P68 usually employs (is usually employed by):E57 Material
>     to P68 foresees use of (use forseen by)
> 
> F) Is E11 Modification.P126 employed (was employed in):E57 Material subproperty of P125 used object of type (was type of object used in)??
> 
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


More information about the Crm-sig mailing list