[Crm-sig] asymmetric relations between people

[Stephen Stead]

Yes a P107.1 would solve it ("in the role of").
You could also solve this by typing the E85 Joining as being "Master
joining" or "Client Joining" which would also solve different levels of
membership ie "Associate Member joining" or "Full member joining".
As the " P107 has current or former member (is current or former member of)"
is such a weak link is it really worth the extra clutter? 
I am happy to have it if everyone thinks it is worthwhile.
Rgds
SdS

Stephen Stead
Tel +44 20 8668 3075 
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail steads at paveprime.com


-----Original Message-----
From: crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr [mailto:crm-sig-bounces at ics.forth.gr] On
Behalf Of c.e.s.ore at edd.uio.no
Sent: 08 November 2008 16:34
To: crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
Subject: [Crm-sig] asymmetric relations between people

We have been studing TEI and CRM today. Family relations found in hold
historical sources can be expressed by the use of group. Eg two sisters
are members of a 'sister'-group'.  But in many historical sources there
are relations like Master-client, tat is asymmetric relations . There is
no .1 type of being a member of a group. Such a .1 would have solved the
problem. Should this be added before the document goes to ISO?

Opinions?

Regards,
Christian-Emil

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig at ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig